Counting photons to measure stress

TSA pattern around a crack propagating from the left with its tip in the centre.

TSA pattern around a crack propagating from the left with its tip in the centre.

Some might find it strange that I am teaching thermodynamics when my research expertise is in structural materials and mechanics. However, the behaviour of structures is largely controlled by energy and how they absorb, store and release it; while thermodynamics is the study of energy flows and transformations, so there is a connection. In my research group, we exploit this connection in a technique for measuring stress fields in components by monitoring the temperature changes that occur when a component is loaded. In Thermoelastic Stress Analysis (TSA) as it is known, we use very sensitive infrared cameras to monitor the cyclic variations of temperature that occur when cyclic load is applied to a material. The temperature changes are of the order of milli-Kelvin, that’s thousandths of a degree, and are positive with negative, or compressive stress and negative with tensile stress. What we are actually measuring is the rate of change in the release of photons by atoms as they are pushed closer together in compression or pulled further apart in tension; but that’s another story and takes us into physics.

An exciting feature of this technique is that as a crack evolves new surfaces are formed which releases energy as heat. We can detect not only the stress field around the crack but also the heat released during the formation of the crack prior it being visible and its subsequent growth.

Sources:

Greene, R.J., Patterson, E.A., Rowlands, R.E., 2008, ‘Thermoelastic stress analysis’, in Handbook of Experimental Mechanics edited by W.N. Sharpe Jr., Springer, New York.

Yang, Y., Crimp, M., Tomlinson, R.A., Patterson, E.A., 2012, Quantitative measurement of plastic strain field at a fatigue crack tip, Proc. R. Soc. A., 468(2144):2399-2415.

Patki, A.S., Patterson, E.A., 2010, ‘Thermoelastic stress analysis of fatigue cracks subject to overloads’, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 33(12):809-821.

 

Advertisements

2 comments

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s